
Capital Plan Workshop Minutes
Tuesday, August 23,
2005 – 7:00 p.m.
School Board
Meeting Room
Susan Hershey –Chair
Lorie Shekailo-Vice-Chair
Dr. David Anderson
Laurie Gaylord
Dr. Sara A. Wilcox, Superintendent
Tom Elfers, School Board Attorney
Nancy Kline
Kristin Conrad, Student Representative (JBHS)
None
present
Press PBPost
– Mike Bender Stuart
News – Kelly Tyko
MCEA – No representation AFSCME – No representation
Call to order by the Chairman and
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States
1. Open to the Public
§
No
representation
Sue
Hershey asked Darla Miloszewski, MCSD Executive Director of Finance, to
introduce Steve Rusnak’s replacement, Sabra Avery. Darla introduced Sabra and Board members
welcomed her. Sabra came from
2. Impact of Certificate
of Participation Issue on 5 year Capital Project Work Program
Darla Miloszewski and Rodger
Osborne presented a power point presentation on the 5-year capital
plan. They presented a scenario
using a $40 million COP, showing what capital projects could be
brought forward. They used figures from the recently approved
tentative budget and
showed the changes a $40 million
COP would make to it. They discussed
what projects they felt
were a priority. They went over the priority projects school
site by school site. The debt
service, principal and interest,
on a $40 million COP for the five year period was estimated at $21.5
million. Darla Miloszewski recommended
that the Board not do the COPs unless they were ready to
spend the funds, concerned that
arbitrage laws could be violated. She
also stated that money should
not be sitting, since interest is
being incurred.
3. Discussion
Board
members discussed individual projects at different schools. Board members concurred that classrooms and
children’s needs would take top priority.
Dr. David Anderson wanted to confirm that equity would be maintained
amongst the school site projects. He reminded Board members that from
experience the Board has learned that the costs to preserve older buildings
outweighed building new structures.
Board members analyzed the numbers in the budget scenario and discussed
FEMA reimbursements and hurricane expenditures. Dr. David Anderson asked the Superintendent if
staff had recommended to do the $40 million COP. Dr. Sara A. Wilcox answered that no, this was
just a workshop scenario to explain what the impact of doing a $40 million COP
would have on the School District’s budget.
Dr. Sara A. Wilcox expressed her concern to bring so many projects
forward at once and the impact that the increased workload would have on the
District’s staff. Rodger Osborne
3. Discussion (Con’t)
explained
that the Facilities Department would adjust the projects according to the flow
of funds. Laurie Gaylord asked Darla
what the difference in revenue would be if the Board chose to impose a ˝ cent
sales tax. Dr. Sara A. Wilcox thought
that bringing all these projects forward at the same time would put too much of
a workload on District staff, and expressed concern about finding enough local
contractors to perform all the work. Laurie
Gaylord agreed. She expressed her
concern about being able to attract competitive bidders in an environment short
of contractors. Lorie Shekailo said that
she wanted to be realistic and determine what amount of projects could be done.
She wanted to be assured that the work
would be of quality standard. She felt that the older schools had needs that
needed to be addressed now. Lorie Shekailo asked Darla if the District would be
penalized if they had to roll over part of the 2 mills. Darla responded no. Darla explained that the District must have
budget capacity before moving forward with any contracts on the capital
projects. Laurie Gaylord expressed her
concern about building more new schools in the light that the market was
changing. Dr. Sara A. Wilcox stated that
she felt a ˝ cent sales tax might be a more moderate approach. Dr. David Anderson asked what the time table
was to make the decision. Dr. Sara A. Wilcox explained that this was a workshop
and no action would be taken now. She
told him that this was the first step, evaluating the information to see what
projects could be brought forward and what the impact of the COPs would be on
the budget. Sue Hershey stated that she
favored COPs as opposed to the ˝ cent sales tax, since new growth management
legislation would probably be making changes in the near future. She wanted to
speak with Don Santos before making a decision.
Lorie Shekailo expressed her concern that the interest rates were going
up and if the Board is going to do this, they need to do it now. Sue Hershey
stated that the Board could make a decision at the September 6th
Special School Board meeting. Dr. David
Anderson said he could not support a sales tax now with the rise in the cost of
living. Lorie Shekailo stated that the
one thing good about the sales tax is that the burden is not entirely on the
residents. Vacationers and visitors to this area help with the burden. Sue
Hershey stated, “We would be chasing a bouncing ball to do the sales tax.” Board members asked Darla Miloszewski and
Rodger Osborne if they would give them a time line on the sales tax issue. Lorie Shekailo requested that Darla give them
an analysis on the time value of money using the COPs. She requested a comparison of the funding
using the time value of money with the interest rate that we are paying on the
COPs and the stream of revenues from the sales tax versus the 30% increase in
the construction costs to see which way really does work financially.
4. Open to the Board
No Board
members requested to speak.
There being no further business
to bring before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
_______________________________
CHAIR (Sue
Hershey)
____________________________
SECRETARY
(Sara A. Wilcox, Ph.D.)